CCTV broadcast of the "New China-Files" challenge
This year is the sixtieth anniversary of the founding of new China Central Television to mark the sixtieth anniversary of the broadcast of the "New Chinese Archives." Read the file, gives the feeling is: Sixty years of new China is taking a straight Cotai Strip, neither tortuous nor errors, smooth sailing all the way to go triumphant over. Therefore, the file is full of great and brilliant achievements, do not see the mistakes and failures. This "new China files", if the next name change is called "Sixty years of New China" exhibition, in the sixties the occasion of Daqing to the nation and people around the world show, I not only doubt, but also likely to applaud, in order to its applause. However, if a new China, file, can not but doubt the authenticity of the file how credible? File history should be factual and comprehensive records, it is necessary to record the success and achievements, but also can not deny that mistakes and failures. Otherwise, how can we be worthy of the database?
I have never seen a country's archives, but as a leading cadre, for employment needs, watched a lot of personal files, which are mostly of its model: curriculum vitae; to achieve any results, subject to what incentives; What is the error committed by the disciplinary actions taken against; the main strengths and weaknesses are. Having seen the files are achievements and error, reward and punishment, both the advantages and disadvantages, have not seen the results of a homogeneous, rewards, benefits files, should there be such a file, I would suspect that file a false, untrue, who were afraid to appoint. From the personal files, we can conclude that: everyone is inevitable does not make mistakes, let alone a country? In particular, a large country like China, in a poor and blank on the basis of a new China and not make mistakes is simply impossible. However, China Central Television broadcast the "New Chinese Archives", the record with dozens of major historical events, there is not even a mistake and failure. Is this true historical records? No!
Sixty years of New China in reform and opening up three decades, not only errors and failures, but also very serious. Anti-rightist whole hundreds of thousands of intellectuals were wrong. Great Leap Forward, pumping out steel, people's communes caused by man-made, tens of millions of people starved to death. The Cultural Revolution almost destroy the party and the state, and economy to the point of bankruptcy, and so on ... ... These are disastrous, horrific mistakes, setbacks and failures, these irrefutable facts, how the files from the new China, it wiped out ? ! This is a falsification of history, the people hide and is not responsible for future generations.
What is even more difficult to understand is that, in order to promote the achievements, even as also are correct mistakes and failures and successes to celebrate.
Three transformation six decades the most serious mistakes and failures of one, but in the "New Chinese Archives" in, but referred to as "the promotion of industry and agriculture and the entire national economy, is indeed a great historic victory" This is totally confused right and wrong.
Three transformation is a negation of the correct line.
As early as the War of Liberation, the central government for the future development of New China, the three major economic policy, namely: the bureaucratic bourgeoisie, the confiscation of property owned by the state, the confiscation of the landlord class, all of the land for the peasants to protect national industry and commerce. Second Plenary Session of the Seventh, but also specifically for the five kinds of economic elements coexist. The five co-existence of diverse economic sectors, but also the national session of the CPPCC adopted by loading the "Common Program" (on behalf of the Constitution), the implementation of the three-year recovery period. Through the three-year recovery period has proved that the coexistence of a variety of diverse economic sectors, perfectly suited to China's national conditions, led to rapid economic take-off in just three years to twelve years of good medical care the wounds of war, creating the world's wonders. But from the beginning 53 years the three major transformation, is to deny a wide range of co-existence of diverse economic sectors, through the transformation, elimination of private capitalism, elimination of private ownership, to diversify into a unified, forming a homogeneous public, a departure from the Chinese national conditions, public opinion against the majority of the people, bound and destruction of the productive forces, so that the economy has taken off, not continue to rise, but fell, not continue to develop, and it shrunk. Commodity on the market, like low tide, like get away, the state had to take state monopoly for purchase and mandatory restrictions on consumption, the countless ticket issued to limit consumption. People's lives is not a move toward common prosperity, but towards a common poverty. All these are the bad consequences of the three major reforms, but the file in the new China was referred to as "the promotion of industry and agriculture and the entire national economy, is indeed a great historic victory." This is not obvious to confuse right and wrong do! If you do not this has been reversed to a non-reversed, will be directly negates the reform and opening.
The fact is that reform and opening up of the three major transformation to correct mistakes and reform. To be the three major transformation, elimination of errors the diversification of a variety of economic sectors, and then restored and developed. Household responsibility system, the error is corrected co-operative, the co-operation from farmers forced collectivization of the land, and then returned to the farmers. Let some people get rich, that is denied to eliminate the capitalists, to encourage people to again when the capitalists. Investment is to recruit foreign capitalists to settle in China. These are the three major transformation with the opposite, is the negation of the three major reforms. As the negation of the three major reform in China has re-established a variety of diversified economic elements coexist economic system. It is this suitable for China's economic system, led to three decades of sustained rapid economic development. If you engage in the three major transformation, China started to take off from the economic recovery period, they will not be premature, but will continue to high-speed development, we can not delay the three decades of good times, so that transformation is by no means the three "historic victory" , but "a historic failure." If you still insist on the three major transformation of a "historic victory", then the place will definitely drive the reform and opening up a "historic failure", I think the absurdity of the conclusions, which turn black and white, who will not be recognized.
The reason why I have repeatedly stressed that mistakes and failures can not be denied, because "failure is the mother of success." Thirty years of reform and opening has been able to achieve brilliant results, it is because our party's reform and opening up three decades ago, the mistakes and failures, not eternal, not evade, face up to failure, to correct mistakes. Corrected the mistakes, failures will translate into success, so failure became "the mother of success" of. We are not only of reform and opening up three decades ago, the mistakes and failures can not be denied, that is, three decades of reform and opening up the mistakes and failures can not be denied. We can not avoid reform and opening up three decades, despite the great glorious achievements, but also there are mistakes and failures. The most prominent is the failure of the spread of corruption, vested interests of wealth formation and poor widening. These failures because of the political system failures caused by lagging seriously behind. If you do not correct the mistakes, speed up political reform, then the thirty years made great achievements will surely be splendid failure swallowed, and it's success will be wasted, so that success is a "failure of the father" of the.
Liu Feng-chang
2009.10
